Legal Opinion

Leaser v. Prime Ascot, L.P.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 12, 2024No. 2:20-cv-02502Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NICHA LEASER, et al., individually, No. 2:20-CV-02502-DJC-AC and on behalf of others similarly 12 situated, 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER 14 v. 15 PRIME ASCOT, L.P., et al., 16 Defendants 17 18 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended 19 Complaint (“SAC”) on the basis that Plaintiffs have failed to join parties required under 20 Rule 19. As discussed below, these parties are not required both because the 21 Plaintiffs will be able to receive complete relief among the named…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API