Legal Opinion

Louisiana Western Lumber Co. v. Stanford

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 29, 1934No. 32579PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

Plaintiff obtained judgment against these defendants for an amount exceeding $2,000. Under a writ of fieri facias, certain property belonging to one of them, Aurelia S. Hart, was seized, advertised, sold, and purchased by plaintiff; the price bid being $3,643.98.

The property was incumbered with a special mortgage which equalled the amount of plaintiff’s bid, and it retained in its hands the entire amount to satisfy the special mortgage. There was therefore nothing to credit on the writ. But the sheriff erroneously returned the writ “fully satisfied.” Subsequently, plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lhote & Co. v. Church Extension Soc. of Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Leverich v. DulinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
  3. Gustine v. New Orleans Oil Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  4. State ex rel. Elder v. Judge of the Third District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Falgout v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Cannella v. Succession of CannellaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  3. Bacher v. KraussSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  4. Louisiana Western Lumber Co. v. StanfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  5. Falgout v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API