Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bispeck v. Board of Commissioners

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1988No. 86-2087PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

An action in man-, damus is a proper course by which laid-off county employees may seek to compel their employer to abide by orders of the State Personnel Board of Review disaffirming their layoffs. State, ex rel. Potten, v. Kuth (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 321, 15 O.O. 3d 391, 401 N.E. 2d 929.

In answering such a complaint for a writ of mandamus, however, the appointing authority may raise as an affirmative defense that the board abused its discretion by disaffirming the layoff order. State, ex rel. Potten, supra; State, ex rel. Ogan, v. Teater (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 235, 8 O.O. 3d 217, 375 N.E.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Ogan v. TeaterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Potten v. KuthOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Weston v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bruce Collyer v. Gregory DarlingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Weiss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Carver v. HullOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Beeler v. Franklin County SheriffOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. McAlpin v. ShireyOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API