Legal Opinion

May v. Supreme Court of State of Colorado

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided April 5, 1974No. Civ. A. C-5528Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CHILSON, District Judge.

This action was initiated by the two Plaintiffs who are attorneys admitted to practice law in the State of Colorado, seeking to enjoin the enforcement of a portion of Rule 227 adopted by the Supreme Court of Colorado on October 25, 1973.

This Rule, in pertinent parts, provides :

“(1) Every attorney admitted to practice in Colorado (including judges, those admitted on a provisional or temporary basis and those admitted as judge advocate) shall pay an annual fee of $20.00; provided that the fee of any attorney whose first admission to practice is within…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. CorrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Lathrop v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Snell v. WymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API