Johnson v. Hudson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
The dual issues brought before this Court on appeal involve a lease and whether the trial court committed reversible error by admitting the testimony of certain witnesses regarding statements made by the deceased concerning the lease and whether the trial court’s construction of a renewal provision contained in the lease was proper.
On January 31,1952, Milford Johnson and wife, Mae Johnson, as lessors, entered into a long term lease with J. E. Hudson, R. G. Heath, F. M. Heath, Max Watkins, Dr. J. F. Stanley, Dr. J. T. Grimes, Graymon Brun-son, B. L. Kelley, C. M. Capps and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Hanks v. HanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Niehuss v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Mizzell v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Taylor v. First National Bank of TuskaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Bell Canyon Shopping Center, L.C.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2000