Legal Opinion
Howard Holt v. City of Battle Creek
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 3, 2019No. 18-1981PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Howard Holt and Martin Erskine appeal from the judgment entered in favor of Defendant City of Battle Creek on Plaintiffs' claim that Defendant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 , et seq. , by failing to pay Plaintiffs overtime wages. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the decision of the district court.
BACKGROUND
Factual History
Plaintiffs Holt and Erskine each served as a battalion chief in Defendant's fire department. Holt was the "suppression" battalion chief from 2007 until his retirement in 2015; Erskine became the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- American Civil Liberties Union v. McCreary CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Steven FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Shean Emmons v. City of ChesapeakeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Timmy FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Lisa Bergman v. Jeremy HowardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Debra Chesnut v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.