Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Drug Enforcement Administration

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 19, 2024No. 1:22-cv-04952Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RANDY STEWART, Plaintiff, No. 22 CV 4952 v. Judge Manish S. Shah DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and UNKNOWN AGENTS, Defendants. ORDER Defendant’s motion to dismiss, [27], is granted. The amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice in part, without prejudice in part. Plaintiff has permission to file a third amended complaint, limited to a Bivens claim against individual agents under the Fourth Amendment and a motion under Section 983 alleging lack of notice (if a good-faith basis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API