Legal Opinion
Bonaventura v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1932No. 6467PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
• SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, denying appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and ordering that appellant be removed to the 'Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio to stand trial on an indictment alleging .violation of the Harrison Narcotic Act (26 USC'A §§ 211, 691-707).
Appellant, Dr. Filiberto A. Bonaventura, is a duly licensed physician and surgeon who has been practicing for some time in Santa Rosa, Cal. Prior to his coming to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Beavers v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Benson v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Tinsley v. TreatSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Application of JacksonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1971
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1968
- United States v. CunninghamDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1941
- Huteson v. Esola, MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932