Legal Opinion

United States v. A Lot of Jewelry

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 9, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

At Law. Information of forfeiture, under Eev. St. § 3082, to secure the condemnation of certain jewelry, alleged to have been brought into the United States contrary to law. The court directed a verdict for the United States, and the cause is now heard on a motion for a new trial, and in arrest of judgment.

Read the full summary

At Law. Information of forfeiture, under Eev. St. § 3082, to secure the condemnation of certain jewelry, alleged to have been brought into the United States contrary to law. The court directed a verdict for the United States, and the cause is now heard on a motion for a new trial, and in arrest of judgment. The information, omitting the caption, was as follows; ‘ “On the 20th day of June, in the year 1893, comes Jesse Johnson, as the attorney of the United States of America for the eastern district of New York, in a cause of seizure and forfeiture of the property, under the revenue and…

1Opinion of the Court

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This is a proceeding, in rem to procure the condemnation of a quantity of jewelry alleged to have been forfeited to the United Status. The value of the jewelry proceeded against is about $12,000. A full description of it is given in the information. A claim and answer having been fded, the case came to trial before the court and a jury. At the close of the testimony introduced hy the government, no testimony being offered hy the claimants, a verdict for the government was directed by the court. The cause now comes up upon a motion for a new trial, and a motion for an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Chaffee & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Lilienthal's Tobacco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Cotzhausen v. NazroSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1947
  2. Feathers of Wild Birds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. Goldman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
  4. Ruehl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  5. Duree v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API