Legal Opinion

Nesbitt v. . Donoho

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 30, 1929PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0! J.

Services rendered gratuitously to one in his lifetime may not successfully be used as the basis of an action against his estate, and, in certain family relationships, the law presumes that such services were intended to be gratuitous. Henderson v. McLain, 146 N. C., 329, 59 S. E., 873; Staley v. Lowe, 197 N. C., 243. But this is a presumption which may be overcome or rebutted by proof of an agreement to pay, or of facts and circumstances permitting the inference that payment was intended on the one hand and expected on the other. Dunn v. Currie, 141 N. C., 123, 53 S. E., 533;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winkler v. Killian.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Brown v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Dunn v. Currie.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Henderson v. . McLainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Staley v. . LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coley v. . DalrympleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Johnson v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Francis v. . FrancisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Stewart v. . WyrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Lipe v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API