Legal Opinion

Purity Feed Mills Co. v. Moore

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 27, 1922No. 25237PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDawkins, J.

Plaintiff sequestered 468 sacks of rice, property of defendant, and claimed a privilege as furnisher of supplies for making the crop. The Bank of Acadia intervened, also asserting a privilege as the furnisher of money for said crop, and, in addition thereto, superior privileges as pledgee of certain warehouse receipts covering 287 sacks and a chattel mortgage upon the remaining 181 sacks of said rice.

The district court recognized the privileges of plaintiff and intervener, but held the latter’s superior to that of the former in virtue of the chattel mortgage and warehouse receipts. The Court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loeb v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. SullivanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  3. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Succession of McCannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Weiss v. Hudson Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Joseph Weill & Co. v. KentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alexandria Production Credit Ass'n v. HornLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Coffey v. PickettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. Brown Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  4. Sauls v. BracyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Dantoni v. DistefanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API