Sauls v. Bracy

A furnisher of supplies intervened in a seizure, claiming a privilege on the crop seized, which outranked that of the seizing creditor., The seizing creditor denied that intervenor ha.d furnished necessary supplies to make the crop. That if any were furnished they were paid for. That intervenor had no privilege under the law because it was not recorded. That the privilege of a “furnisher of supplies” must be recorded; otherwise there is no privilege.

Prom a judgment in favor of intervenor the plaintiff appeals.

M. N. Sauls, a judgment creditor of M. L. Bracy, seized Bracy’s share of a crop in…