Legal Opinion

United States v. Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 13, 1973No. Appeal No. 2-73; Ind. Cl. Comm. Docket No. 182PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on the appellee-plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the appeal of the defendant. Resolution of the issue involved in this case rests on the interpretation to be given section 20(b) of the In*527dian Claims Commission Act, 60 Stat. 1049, 1054, now 25 TJ.S.C. §70s(b), dealing with tbe appealability of interlocutory orders of tbe Indian Claims Commission (ICC). Tbe court lias considered tbe case, without oral argument, upon the authorities and contentions presented in tbe motion, tbe response thereto and reply. It is concluded that tbe standards set by statute defining…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. United States v. Fort Sill Apache Tribe of OklahomaUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Fort Sill Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. United States v. Fort Sill Apache Tribe of the State of OklahomaUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. United States v. Fort Peck Indians of the Fort Peck ReservationUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  4. Fort Sill Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. McGheeUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API