Legal Opinion
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 5, 1963No. 11-61PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
We are called upon in this interlocutory appeal by the Indians1 to decide *908whether the Indian Claims Commission erred in lopping off two eastern and northern segments from a large area in Minnesota which it ruled was otherwise held by Indian title in 1855 when the United States acquired the region by cession. 8 Ind.Cl.Comm. 781, Docket 18-B (1960). Though evidently dissatisfied with the award of the remainder of the area to the Indians, the United States • has not sought its own interlocutory appeal, preferring, it appears, to await the final termination of the suit after the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hynes, Regional Director, Fish & Wildlife Service v. Grimes Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Northwestern Bands of Shoshone Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Old SettlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Cherokee Nation v. JourneycakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Delaware Tribal Business Committee v. WeeksSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- LAC Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- The Snoqualmie Tribe of Indians, on Its Own Behalf, and on Relation of the Skykomish Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Bentley L. Holt and Bonnie J. Holt v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.