Legal Opinion
Protect The Peninsula's Future v. Haaland
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 15, 2025No. 3:23-cv-05737Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 PROTECT THE PENINSULA’S CASE NO. CV23-5737-BHS 8 FUTURE; COALITION TO PROTECT PUGET SOUND HABITAT; and ORDER 9 BEYOND PESTICIDES, 10 Plaintiffs, v. 11 DEB HAALAND, SECRETARY OF 12 THE INTERIOR; UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; 13 MARTHA WILLIAMS, DIRECTOR OF UNITED STATES FISH AND 14 WILDLIFE SERVICE; HUGH MORRISON, REGIONAL DIRECTOR 15 OF THE PACIFIC REGION; and JENNIFER BROWN SCOTT, 16 PROJECT LEADER, WASHIN, 17 Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Limited Intervenor Jamestown S’Klallam…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Conner v. BurfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Makah Indian Tribe v. C. William VerityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,389 Irving A. Backman v. Polaroid Corporation, Irving A. Backman v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- National Wildlife Federation v. Robert F. Burford, Mountain States Legal Foundation (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.