Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Atanga

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1994No. 49S00-9307-DI-801Published

1DissentSullivan, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The sanction imposed by the court is grossly disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.

The court suspends Mr. Atanga from the practice of law for several ill-advised decisions that he made during the course of a kafkaesque series of events. Approximately one year after being admitted to the bar, Mr. Atanga traveled to Lafayette to represent without charge an indigent, troubled young woman for whom no local representation was apparently available. After Mr. Atanga agreed to represent the woman in another matter (also without charge), the judge granted his request to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Price v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc. v. FIELDSIndiana Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API