Dean v. Kellogg
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
We are reviewing on one record the dismissal of a stockholders’ derivative suit and the denial of a petition for discovery.
Plaintiffs filed a bill of complaint in chancery on behalf of themselves and any other stockholders and creditors of Seedtown Products, Inc., and Warren- Teed Seed Company who might care to join in and contribute to the expense of the proceedings. The trial court granted a motion to dismiss on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, laches and multifariousness. We shall summarize the allegations of the-lengthy bill. Plaintiffs are the owners of over 130,-000 shares in a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Davenport v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Miller v. Magline, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Turner v. United Mineral Lands Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Dean v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
- Jaffe v. HarrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.