Legal Opinion

State v. Caswell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 30, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Patricia Caswell appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Atwood, J.) following a jury trial convicting her of a third offense of operating under the influence. The operating under the influence charge was a Class D offense pursuant to 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411 (1996 & Supp.2000) with two prior convictions as aggravating factors.1 Cas-well contends that the court erred in (1) ruling that a competing harms justification, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 103(1) (1983)2 was not generated by the evidence, and (2) *377excluding expert testimony in support of her competing harms…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. KeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. State v. WilderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. State v. GliddenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. State v. GreenwaldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. State v. KnowlesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CleavesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. State v. LemieuxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. State v. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. State v. SouleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. State of Maine v. Heath G. DemerchantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API