Legal Opinion

State v. Lemieux

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 12, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.

[¶ 1] Daniel M. Lemieux appeals from the judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol pursuant to 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411(1) (Class D), 1 entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County; Cole, J.) after a jury trial. Lemieux contends that the trial court erred when it denied his request for a jury instruction on the competing harms defense pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 103. 2 We disagree and affirm the judgment. 3

[¶ 2] Jury instructions are reviewed “‘as a whole to ensure that they informed the jury correctly and fairly in all necessary respects of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. WilderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. State v. KnowlesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. State v. DanielsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. State v. PooleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Eric NoblesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  2. State v. BouchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. State v. HollandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. State v. KimSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API