State v. Lemieux
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Daniel M. Lemieux appeals from the judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol pursuant to 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411(1) (Class D), 1 entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County; Cole, J.) after a jury trial. Lemieux contends that the trial court erred when it denied his request for a jury instruction on the competing harms defense pursuant to 17-A M.R.S.A. § 103. 2 We disagree and affirm the judgment. 3
[¶ 2] Jury instructions are reviewed “‘as a whole to ensure that they informed the jury correctly and fairly in all necessary respects of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. WilderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- State v. KnowlesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- State v. DanielsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- State v. PooleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Maine v. Eric NoblesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- State v. BouchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- State v. HollandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- State v. MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- State v. KimSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001