Legal Opinion

United States v. Ho

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 15, 2020No. 19-00038Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 20-66 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. Before: Timothy M. Reif, Judge CHU-CHIANG “KEVIN” HO, Court No. 19-00038 and ATRIA CORPORATION, Defendants. OPINION [Quashing plaintiff’s service of process upon defendant, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(1), and extending the time period for plaintiff to effect service of process pursuant to USCIT Rule 4(l).] Dated: May 15, 2020 William George Kanellis, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, D.C. for plaintiff. With him on…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Hyatt International Corp. v. Gerardo CocoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API