Legal Opinion
Loomis Courier Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1979No. 78-1858PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board (Board), reversing the decision of an administrative law judge (ALJ), found that Loomis Courier Service Inc. (Loomis) had discriminatorily discharged its employees and thereafter treated those employees as “new hires” in violation of §§ 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) and (3). 235 NLRB No. 60 (1978). Loomis petitioned for review and the Board cross-petitioned for enforcement pursuant to §§ 10(e) and (f) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 160(e) and (f). We grant the petition for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- National Labor Relations Board v. Haberman Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Karl Kallmann, D/B/A Love's Barbeque Restaurant, No. 62, and Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Anderson v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- National Labor Relations Board v. American Postal Workers Union, St. Louis, Missouri Local Afl-Cio and United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.