Legal Opinion

Heaney v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 5, 1970No. 389, Docket 33683PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.

This is one of the increasing number of cases in which plaintiffs who sought the convening of three-judge courts to declare state statutes unconstitutional and to enjoin their enforcement have appealed from orders of district judges denying their requests and dismissing the complaints for want of a substantial federal question. See, e. g., Miller v. New York Stock Exchange, 2 Cir., 425 F.2d 1074, decided January 2, 1970.

*870Here the plaintiffs are doctors of chiropractic, and the statute is Article 132 of the New York Education Law, McKinney's Consol.Laws, c. 16, §§…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Clarence Jackson v. Hon. Emett C. Choate, U.S. District Judge, Southern District of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. Port Authority Bondholders Protective Committee, Henry W. Klein, Alvin S. Lane, Adele W. Ginsberg and Morris L. Lewy v. Port of New York AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Welsch v. LikinsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1974
  2. Hyatt v. United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1970
  3. James F. Ahern v. Morgan F. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  4. Torres v. New York State Department of LaborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  5. Woe v. MathewsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API