Legal Opinion

Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Barnes

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

The Bailway appealed from judgments for damages in three cases tried together in favor of Barnes, the driver of a car which collided with a freight train, and his two guests. The charge was common law negligence in failing to give proper warnings or signals. The Court of Appeals found that the uncontroverted testimony showed that the plaintiffs were guilty of negligence which proximately caused the accidental collision, and, holding that the trial Judge should have directed verdicts for the defendant, reversed and dismissed the actions. This Court granted certiorari to review this issue and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Todd v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SatterwhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Phillips v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Nashville, C. & St. L. R. v. ParksTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. StagnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  2. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  3. Francis v. Atlantic Terminals, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  4. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. SkeltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API