Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Ionia; Dodds, J., presiding. Case by Oscar Phillips against the Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company for personal injuries. Prom a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

This action is brought to recover damages for an injury to the plaintiff by a passenger train at a highway crossing on the defendant’s road. On Sunday, June 4, 1893, a washout had occurred on the Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway, between Lansing and Durand, so that the through passenger train from Chicago eastward was taken from Lansing to Ionia, thence eastward to Du-rand, over the defendant’s road, passing through the village of Muir, where the accident happened. The train passed the station at Muir, without stopping, a little past noon, running at a rapid rate of speed, the witnesses varying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Shufelt v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Houghton v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Jensen v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SatterwhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Stewart v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Britton v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Cinadar v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Lau v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API