Legal Opinion

McCloskey & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 5, 1942No. 44003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLitteetoN, Judge

Plaintiff sues under the act of June 25, 1938, 52 Stat. 1197, to recover $29,238.05 for increased costs alleged to have been incurred and paid as a result of the enactment of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, in the performance of a contract with the defendant entered into November 26,1932. This amount is made up of three items: First, a wage increase for common labor on October 18,1933, from twenty-five to thirty-five cents an hour, which increase, from October 18 to completion of the contract, amounted to $13,615.30; second, a further increase on January 19,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fasulo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Smith v. AppleSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. General Investment Co. v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. McElvainSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Sperry Gyroscope Co. v. Arma Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. National Fireproofing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  3. Adam v. StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  4. John Weenink & Sons Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  5. Riethmiller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API