McCloskey & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtLitteetoN, Judge
Plaintiff sues under the act of June 25, 1938, 52 Stat. 1197, to recover $29,238.05 for increased costs alleged to have been incurred and paid as a result of the enactment of the National Industrial Recovery Act, approved June 16, 1933, in the performance of a contract with the defendant entered into November 26,1932. This amount is made up of three items: First, a wage increase for common labor on October 18,1933, from twenty-five to thirty-five cents an hour, which increase, from October 18 to completion of the contract, amounted to $13,615.30; second, a further increase on January 19,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fasulo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Smith v. AppleSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- General Investment Co. v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. McElvainSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Sperry Gyroscope Co. v. Arma Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- National Fireproofing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
- Adam v. StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
- John Weenink & Sons Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
- Riethmiller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944