Legal Opinion
Smith v. Apple
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 10, 1924No. 124PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford
The record presents a preliminary question as to our jurisdiction of this appeal. This we must consider, although not raised by counsel. Stevirmac Oil Co. v. Dittman, 245 U. S. 210, 214.
This is & suit in equity brought in the District Court by a citizen of Oklahoma against a citizen of Kansas to enjoin the latter from enforcing certain judgments that he had recovered against the plaintiff in a state court — which were alleged to be unconscionable and void — and, incidentally, from further prosecuting a suit in the District Court that had been brought by him against a. surety on a super-sedeas…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- National Surety Co. v. State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kimberlee Williams v. BASF Catalysts LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.