Legal Opinion

Adam v. States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 7, 1945No. 44230Published

1Opinion of the Court

*775 Opinion

2Per curiam

The court has jurisdiction of the-claim. The Kawneer Company, et al., v. United States, 100 C. Cls. 523.

The proof shows that plaintiff incurred increased labor-costs of $938.01 as a result of the enactment of the National Industrial Becovery Act, but the evidence fails to-show what amount of increased costs, if any, were incurred for material and overhead as a result of the enactment of that act.

Defendant says that plaintiff’s compliance with the National Industrial Act Code (finding 5) was so incomplete-that it would not be fair and equitable to allow it reimbursement under the act…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCloskey & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  2. Kawneer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  3. Consumers Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API