Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1977Published

1DissentHenry, Justice

I dissent from so much of the Court’s opinion as affirms the Court of Appeals’ reversal of the trial judge’s award of a ten percent “bad faith” penalty.

The majority ignores the correct standard of review and, in so doing, falls into the same error as was committed by the Court of Appeals of substituting its judgment for that of the trial judge. Sec. 27-303, T.C.A. provides that in “[a]ll cases tried in a court of record without the intervention of a jury”, the hearing in the appellate court “shall be de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Auto. Ins. Co. of Columbus, Ohio v. RowlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Daugherty v. Stuyvesant Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API