Legal Opinion

Daugherty v. Stuyvesant Ins. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

These consolidated causes were instituted for the purpose of recovering on two fire policies of $600' each. The chancellor entered decrees for the face value of the policies, with interest and twenty-five per cent, penalties. The Court of Appeals affirmed in all respects, except as to the penalties. Both parties filed petitions for writs of certiorari.

Complainants, Charles E. Daugherty and wife, negroes, on March 27, 1928, purchased the property involved, located in Memphis, from Dan Whitney for $1,850. They made a small cash payment and executed monthly notes for the balance, secured by a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Ex Rel. First National Bank v. Aetna InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  2. Marlin Financial & Leasing Corp. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  3. Johnson v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Johnson v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API