Legal Opinion

Fickerle v. Herman Seekamp, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 6, 1934No. Gen. No. 36,886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

In an action on the case a jury found defendant guilty and assessed plaintiff’s damages at the sum of $5,000. Defendant has appealed from the judgment entered upon the verdict.

The first count of the declaration charges general negligence. The second, wilful and wanton conduct. The third, a violation of the statute of the State regulating the speed of automobiles in the business districts of municipalities. The fourth, a wilful and wanton violation of the State statute that regulates the speed of automobiles in said districts. The fifth, that defendant, by its agent and servant, negligently…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bernier v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Walldren Express & Van Co. v. KrugIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Brown v. Illinois Terminal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Jeneary v. Chicago & Interurban Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Chicago City Railway Co. v. TuohyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. Wallace v. WeinrichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Nattens v. Grolier Society, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  4. Tuttle v. Checker Taxi Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  5. Foale v. LinskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API