Legal Opinion

Tilghman v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 8, 1962No. 50498PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

This is a law action to recover from defendants Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. and Carroll Pletcher, engineer on its freight train, for personal injuries to plaintiff, Charles Tilghman, driver of a truck which collided with the train at a grade crossing near the northwest edge of the town of Woolstock. Defendants appeal from judgment against them on jury verdict for plaintiff under the doctrine of last clear chance.

Errors are assigned in: rulings that a jury question was piesented under the last-clear-ehance doctrine, giving instructions 7 and 11 to the jury, excluding certain testimony, and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Hackman v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Peterson v. BurkhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ruud v. GrimmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Commonwealth v. PearMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rosenau Ex Rel. Rosenau v. City of EsthervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Henneman v. McCallaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Sandman v. HaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Sheets v. Ritt, Ritt & Ritt, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Anthes v. AnthesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API