Tuttle v. Checker Taxi Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely
This is an appeal by defendants from an order of the trial court granting a new trial.
Plaintiff sought to recover compensation for personal injuries, and upon trial by a jury defendants were found not guilty; plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was allowed; defendants, moving under section 77 of the Civil Practice Act, in force January 1, 1934, Cahill’s St. ch. 110, 205, petitioned this court for leave to appeal from this order, which leave was granted; briefs were filed by both sides and oral argument heard.
A question of practice in appeals of this sort is presented. The plaintiff contends…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bain Peanut Co. of Tex. v. PinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Jeneary v. Chicago & Interurban Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. TuohyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- United States Brewing Co. v. StoltenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Commonwealth Electric Co. v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Parkin v. RigdonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- People ex rel. Wilmette State Bank v. Village of WilmetteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- Rasmussen v. WileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Handell v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- McQueeney v. Catholic Bishop of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.