Rosenberger v. City of Casper Board of Adjustment
Wyoming Supreme Court
1DissentUrbigkit, Justice
I dissent because neither this record nor the law supports the premise of the majority decision that the City of Casper Board of Adjustment (Board) could not grant a rehearing which would toll the time for the Rosenbergers to appeal. Additionally, the time limitation for administrative agency appeal properly commences upon denial of rehearing or a decision on rehearing as expressly stated by W.R.A.P. 12.04 as constituting the second error in majority decision.
Specifically, I would hold as documented in the record that the Board had the authority and had adopted rehearing rules. Further, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- West Penn Power Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Lee M. Thomas, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Delta Drilling Co. v. CannetteMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- Hupp v. Employment Security Commission of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.