Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rosenberger v. City of Casper Board of Adjustment

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1988No. 88-138Published

1DissentUrbigkit, Justice

I dissent because neither this record nor the law supports the premise of the majority decision that the City of Casper Board of Adjustment (Board) could not grant a rehearing which would toll the time for the Rosenbergers to appeal. Additionally, the time limitation for administrative agency appeal properly commences upon denial of rehearing or a decision on rehearing as expressly stated by W.R.A.P. 12.04 as constituting the second error in majority decision.

Specifically, I would hold as documented in the record that the Board had the authority and had adopted rehearing rules. Further, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. West Penn Power Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Lee M. Thomas, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Delta Drilling Co. v. CannetteMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hupp v. Employment Security Commission of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API