Legal Opinion
Martinez v. De Los Rios
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1958No. Civ. 5732PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This action arises from alleged trespass on mining claims; unlawful conversion of ore therefrom; damage to plaintiff’s mine improvements; for an accounting; to quiet title of plaintiff in and to said claims; and for injunction.
After extensive trial, the court found in general substance (trial court finding numbers) (1) that plaintiff is the owner of the mining claims as alleged in plaintiff’s complaint, being six in all and being named “Liberty,” “Liberty No. 1,” “Liberty No. 2,” “Liberty Fraction No. 3,” “Rosa,” and “Bentonite”; (3) that defendants did without plaintiff’s consent take 1,200…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bailey v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Luke v. Mercantile Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Martinez v. De Los RiosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960