Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON SPOLIATION AND THE UNCLEAN HANDS DEFENSE
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
I. FEDERAL CIRCUIT’S MANDATE
On May 13, 2011, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion affirming in part and vacating in part this court’s judgment in the subject patent case between Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor U.K. Ltd, and Hynix Semiconductor Deutschland GmbH (collectively “Hynix”)1 and Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”). Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 645 F.3d 1336 (Fed.Cir.2011) (“Hynix II”). Specifically relevant here is that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- John W. Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., a New York Corporation and Volkswagenwerk, A. G., a Foreign Corporation, Wolfsburg, Western GermanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Micron Technology, Inc. v. Rambus Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Goldstein v. DennerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2024
- Hernandez v. Franco American Baking CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021