Legal Opinion
Banco Mercantil, S. A. v. Sauls Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1956No. Civ. 21182PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem. *
By its complaint in this action, the plaintiff, a Mexican banking institution, seeks to recover as the holder in good faith upon an instrument executed by the defendant as drawer in favor of one Barbe as payee and upon the Bank of America as drawee. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
The relevant facts established by the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the respondent are:
The defendant Sanls, Inc., was at the times hereinafter mentioned engaged in business as a commission agent in the marketing, for growers, of various…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American National Bank of San Francisco v. A. G. Sommerville, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Safway Steel Products, Inc. v. LefeverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. GandyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Nilson v. SarmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Lusitanian-American Development Co. v. Seaboard Dairy Credit Corp.California Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
- City of Pleasanton v. Board of Administration of Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Henry v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Collins v. Home Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Kiernan v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.