Murphy v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, Judge.
This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission award for a noncom-pensable claim. The sole issue presented is whether a physical injury caused by the emotional stress of being notified of displacement from one’s job is compensable. Because the emotional stress in this case was not unexpected, unusual, or extraordinary, the physical injury is noncompensable and we therefore affirm the award.
FACTS
On August 8, 1985, claimant fainted and struck his head on the floor while employed by the respondent employer, Honeywell, Inc. A worker’s report of injury was thereafter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Sloss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Valerio v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Scheller v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Toto v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murphy v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Linnen v. Beaufort County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991