Sgobel & Day v. Craven
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, District Judge.
Defendant in error brought an action at law in the state court for recovery of money on contract, and by the plaintiff in error it was removed to the federal court. The record of removal was filed on December 15, 1925, and on the same day the plaintiff below filed a motion for a dismissal without prejudice. The motion was continued to January 4,1926, upon which day it was duly submitted, and was allowed. At the same time defendant below filed an answer to the complaint, incorporating therein a counterclaim. Upon allowing the motion to dismiss, the court “ordered and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Haldeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hoover v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Potter Realty Co. v. DerbyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Lane v. BallOregon Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Whittel v. RocheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Russo-Asiatic Bank v. Guaranty Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Popp v. ArchbellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1952