Legal Opinion
Russo-Asiatic Bank v. Guaranty Trust Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 16, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The suit was commenced in 1919 by the plaintiff, then or formerly a Russian corporation, for an accounting and for payment of an alleged balance due to the plaintiff. It has never been tried on the merits. In 1936 one Millard was permitted to intervene, over the defendant’s opposition. In his pleading, called an answer and cross-bill, Millard alleged that the plaintiff was entitled to an accounting from the defendant and that an accounting would show a balance due the plaintiff of upwards of $2,-000,000; that the Chinese government had a valid claim against the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Union Rolling Mill Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- City of Detroit v. Detroit City Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lankenau v. Coggeshall & HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Wilson & Co. v. Fremont Cake & Meal Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1949
- John C. Lankenau, Esq., as Receiver of Lester D. Brown, D/B/A L. D. Brown Co. v. Coggeshall & Hicks, Applicant-Appellee. This Case Came Up on Appeal Under the Style SEC v. Brown, That Used in the District Court. Upon Request, However, the Case on Appeal Has Been Renamed, as Indicated. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lester D. Brown, D/B/A L. D. Brown Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965