Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Pringle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 4, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before Hon. William H. Stewart.

1Opinion of the Court

The appellee J.M. Pringle, as assignee of A.M. Pringle, brought this action against A.H. Casteel and his wife, Mary J. Casteel, for the recovery of a certain sum of money which it was alleged the said A.H. Casteel had promised to pay A.M. Pringle. Casteel and his wife answered that they had been served with writs of garnishment at the suit of C.E. Fleming and J.C. McBride, and asked that Fleming and McBride, as well as A.M. Pringle, be made parties to the suit. Fleming and McBride both appeared and answered and prayed judgment for the amount of their respective claims against Casteel and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hochstadler Bros. v. SamTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. El Paso National Bank v. FuchsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Stiff v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Youngblood v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Fortenberry v. Warren Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Big Four Shoe Stores Co. v. LudlamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Hunsaker v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Keppler v. Texas Lumber Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API