Booth v. Coward
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtStayton, J.
The sole assignment of error in the application raises the question of the proper measure of damages for deceit in the case of a contract of exchange.
Plaintiff owned certain real estate in Falls county; defendant a half section in Hartley. Against each were incumbrances securing notes to third persons. While negotiating an exchange of these parcels, defendant showed to plaintiff’s agent, as the land he was to put 'into the deal, a tract with a well and windmill on it. This induced the contract and the subsequent deeds, whereby the parcels actually belonging to the respective parties were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Moore v. BeaklexTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Harper v. Lott Town & Improvement Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Lott Town & Improvement Co. v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- El Paso Development Company v. RavelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Sibley v. Southland Life Ins. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
- Texas Industrial Traffic League v. Railroad Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Hudson & Hudson Realtors v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Dowlin v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.