Legal Opinion

Najera v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2009No. S-08-0203PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[T1] Appellant was convicted of two counts of second-degree sexual assault, four counts of third-degree sexual assault, and six counts of incest. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his convie-tions on five of the six sexual assault counts. He also contends that the sentences for the incest convictions should merge with the sexual assault sentences. We find that sufficient evidence exists to support the convie-tions and affirm all of the convictions. We also determine that five of the six incest sentences should merge with the corresponding sexual…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bush v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Bilderback v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Owen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ivan Lee Sweets, Sr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Rathbun v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Benjamin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Carlos Yammon Pena v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Baker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API