Brown v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The focus in this appeal by James Franklin Brown (Brown) is that the trial court failed to confine the proof offered by the State to the essential elements of the charged offenses and that the product of this error was to deprive him of his right to a fair trial and a unanimous verdict. Brown complains specifically of the admission of evidence of uncharged misconduct, without proper scrutiny and without appropriate limiting instructions; the refusal of the trial court to limit the consideration of uncharged misconduct and to restrict the jury in its deliberations to those acts…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Scadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Grabill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Olsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Giles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- James v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Pierson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.