Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1991No. 90-194PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The focus in this appeal by James Franklin Brown (Brown) is that the trial court failed to confine the proof offered by the State to the essential elements of the charged offenses and that the product of this error was to deprive him of his right to a fair trial and a unanimous verdict. Brown complains specifically of the admission of evidence of uncharged misconduct, without proper scrutiny and without appropriate limiting instructions; the refusal of the trial court to limit the consideration of uncharged misconduct and to restrict the jury in its deliberations to those acts…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Scadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Grabill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Olsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Giles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. James v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Pierson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API