Legal Opinion
Eagle Pacific Insurance Co. v. Christensen Motor Yacht Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1998No. 65883-8PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
Eagle Pacific Insurance Company (Eagle Pacific) filed an action against Christensen Motor Yacht Corporation (CMYC) to recover unpaid insurance premiums. Because CMYC was insolvent, Eagle Pacific sought to recover the debt from Christensen Group, Inc. (CGI), Christensen Shipyards, Limited (CSL), and David Christensen personally.
The Court of Appeals held CSL was liable for CMYC’s *897debts under the successor liability doctrine. Eagle Pac. Ins. Co. v. Christensen Motor Yacht Corp., 85 Wn. App. 695, 934 P.2d 715 (1997). The Court of Appeals remanded for further fact-finding on the separate issue of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Raytech Corporation v. Earl WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hall v. Armstrong Cork, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union v. Gateway Cafe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Eagle Pacific Insurance v. Christensen Motor Yacht Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Associated Oil Co. v. Seiberling Rubber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ries v. Wintz Properties, Inc. (In Re Wintz Companies)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Parker v. Western Dakota Insurors, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Thompson v. HansonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Penny L. Springer v. Nohl Electric Products CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Eagle Pacific Insurance Company v. Christensen Motor Yacht CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.