Penny L. Springer v. Nohl Electric Products Corporation
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel Kelly, J.
*442¶ 1 When one company purchases the assets of another, our law normally does not *443make the former responsible for the latter's liabilities. There are exceptions to that rule, however, such as when the parties use the transaction to fraudulently escape responsibility for those liabilities. Notwithstanding the great age of this common-law exception to successor non-liability, we have had scant occasion to provide guidance on how to recognize such transactions. We take the opportunity to do so today.1 Specifically, we conclude that the Wisconsin Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act does not govern the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. Timothy E. DobbsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- J. Steven Tikalsky v. Susan FriedmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- Veritas Steel, LLC v. Lunda Construction CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Melissa A. Hubbard v. Carol J. Neuman, MDWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
- Charles Aldean v. City of WoodburyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.