Legal Opinion

United States v. James Sherman Blackwell, A/K/A Jim Blackwell, A/K/A Snake

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 23, 1985No. 85-7009PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER:

This order addresses what is perhaps the most unsettling circumstance which may confront an advocate under our adversary system of justice, counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of his client on appeal based upon his conscientious belief that the appeal is frivolous. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Our courts have from the beginning recognized that able advocates are the sine qua non of sound adjudication. See The Antelope, 23 U.S. (10 Wheat.) 66, 114, 6 L.Ed. 268 (1825) (Marshall, C.J.). And yet, in our contemporary era of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. The AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1825

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Leslie EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Loop v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. United States v. Charles K. Griffy and Emma GriffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Chapman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Matter of BrazeltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API