Legal Opinion
Critchlow v. Bacon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 11, 1930No. 16989PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The defendant in error was the plaintiff in the trial court, and the plaintiffs in error were defendants in that court. The parties will be referred to as “plaintiff” and “defendants.”
Plaintiff instituted this suit on October 8, 1923, and on March 11, 1924, he filed the amended petition, on which the cause was tried. The object of the action was threefold; First, to cancel a certain oil and gas •lease; second, to cancel a certain royalty conveyance; and, third, to cancel a certain warranty deed.
The amended petition alleged, and it is admitted, that the plaintiff is a full-blood Choctaw…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moore v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Tiger v. DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Owen v. United States Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Hope v. FoleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Flowers v. StanleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Harrell v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Oklahoma City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Setterstrom v. PhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Cotcha v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.