Legal Opinion

Lamoureux v. Haight

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 28, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-3051-WPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WOLF, District Judge.

Plaintiff Paul Lamoureux, a former police officer in the Town of West Bridgewater, Massachusetts has brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Town of West Bridgewater (the “Town”), several Town Selectmen, and the Chief of Police. Lamoureux alleges that defendants violated plaintiffs federally protected rights by engaging in a course of conduct that denied him certain benefits under Mass. Gen. Laws c. 41, § 111F, related to a back injury suffered in the line of duty.

Defendants have moved to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff fails to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robert W. Decker v. Hillsborough County Attorney's Office, Robert W. Decker v. Paul McDonough Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Mandel v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  3. Anselma Station, Ltd. v. Pennoni Associates, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Fisichelli v. Town of MethuenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
  5. Maldonado v. Municipality of BarcelonetaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API