Legal Opinion
Rogosin v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 4, 2002No. Civ.A. WMN-00-3474PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 56). 1 The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. Upon a review of the pleadings applicable case law, this Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and that Defendants’ motion will be granted as to both Mr. Rogosin and Mr. Ruckle.
/. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs were terminated from the Baltimore City Law Department, where they had been employed for many years as associate city solicitors. Plaintiffs are white men in their 50’s. 2 Mr. Ruckle joined the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gonzalez v. El Dia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Luy v. Baltimore Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Luppino v. Evans (In Re Evans)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Taylor v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Barton v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002