Legal Opinion
Gray v. County of Madera
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 2008No. F053661PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARDAIZ, P. J.
INTRODUCTION
Sheryl and Bruce Gray appeal from the dismissal of their petition for writ of mandate and complaint for injunctive declaratory relief. For the following reasons, we reverse.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Sheryl and Bruce Gray (Petitioners or Appellants) filed a petition for writ of mandate challenging the decision of the County of Madera and the Madera County Board of Supervisors (collectively the County or Respondents) to issue a conditional use permit and a mining permit, to approve a rezoning, and to certify an environmental impact report (EIR) in connection with the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Poet v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- City of Maywood v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Oakland Heritage Alliance v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.